Evaluasi Proyek Pekerjaan Konstruksi  Secara Kontraktual dan Pekerjaan Konstruksi  Berbasis Masyarakat

Eyet Cahyat Sudrajat; R. Didin Kusdian

Eyet Cahyat Sudrajat Universitas Sangga Buana
R. Didin Kusdian Universitas Sangga Buana

Keywords: Contractual, community empowerment, stakeholders, Analytical Hierarchy Process, validation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The time, quality, and cost control systems on projects, community participation as support, and good administration as evidence of accountability for construction implementation. The purpose of the research is to determine the important factors in choosing the implementation of construction projects, the weight of the criteria, and choosing the implementation of construction work projects by contractual or community empowerment methods using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method. Interview methods and questionnaires were then processed and analyzed with the provision that the Consistency Ratio test value was less than 10%. The results of the analysis obtained were then validated with the interview method from the respondents' representatives. From the results of the study, it was found that the weight of those who chose contractual project implementation was 0.692, and those who chose community empowerment construction were 0.308. There are five criteria for choosing alternatives between contractual and community empowerment, namely, time criteria of 0.652, cost criteria of 0.606, quality criteria of 0.655, community participation criteria of 0.559 and administrative criteria weighing 0.622. While the weights that choose the implementation of community empowerment construction projects according to time are 0.348, costs are 0.395, quality is 0.346, community participation is 0.442, and administration is 0.379.

Keywords: Contractual, community empowerment, stakeholders, Analytical Hierarchy Process, validation.

References

Boothroyd (1982, 15), http:///pengertian pemberdayaan.com

Cook (1994), Giarci (2001), Bartle (2003), Subejo dan Supriyanto (2004), Deliveri (2004), Chambers (2001), Nasikun (2000:27), http:///F:/Pemberdayaan/Pemberdayaan201.htm

Cleland, Wr. King (1987), Pengertian Proyek, http:///:www.pengertian proyek.com

Chasanah, U. (2013). Komparasi proyek konstruksi kontraktual dengan proyek konstruksi berbasis pemberdayaan masyarakat tesis.

Dipohusodo, (1996), Manajemen Proyek dan Konstruksi jilid 1 dan 2, Kannisius, Yogyakarta

Dipohusodo (1996) :///F:/pengertianproyek/-pengertian-ciri-ciri-dan jenis -proyek-konstruksi.htm

Lotus, E. F. & Palmer, J. C. (1974) Reconstruction of automobile Destruction An Example f the Interaction Between Language and Memory, Journal Of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13,585-589.

Ervianto, (2005), Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi, Edisi 2, Andi, Yogyakarta

Friedmen (1992), Konsepsi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat-Bahan Kuliah PPS SP ITB

Abdi, H. & Williams, L. J. (2010) Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) Test, E-mail: herve@utdallas.edu http://www. utd.edu/~herve

Abdi, H. & Williams, L. J. (2010), Newman-Keuls Test and Tukey Test, E-mail: herve@utdallas.edu http://www.utd.edu/~herve

Ismiyati, (2003), Statistika dan aplikasinya, Program Pasca Sarjana UNDIP

Keputusan Presiden No. 13 tahun 2009, tentang Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), Sumber: Software Acquisition Gold Practice Track Earned Value,2009).

Menteri Negara Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Kepala Bappenas, Pembiayaan Infrastruktur dan Pemukiman, stadium General Institut Teknologi Bandung

Moelyarto (1999: 37-38), http///F: Pemberdayaan.Pemberdayaan.htm

Nazar, (2006) Analisis Pengendalian Biaya dan Waktu Dengan Metode Earned Value Concept, Tesis, Magister Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta

Nurdiana, (2011), Aplikasi Manajemen Resiko dari Persepsi Para Stakeholder (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan jalan Tol Semarang – Solo Seksi satu Ruas Tembalang – Gedawang.